I have written a number of entries on health care and its costs. The United States, though experiencing a lower rate of increase of health care costs recently, still far exceeds the costs incurred for similar procedures and treatments in other industrialized countries.

This issue has been driven home for me of late in light of my own health issues which have contributed to my absence from my blog.

On this past Friday my urologist reported the results of my previous week’s biopsy to me. I had been having blood in my urine…or hematuria…since late June. My family doctor first examined me and then sent me to a specialist, the urologist. I underwent a series of exams and procedures..two CAT scans, an ultrasound, and then a cystoscopy in the urologist’s office in which a scope is inserted into the urethra in order for the doctor to examine the interior walls of my bladder. The exam showed redness/irritation and thus the biopsy.

I am happy to say that the growth was malignant—happy because during the biopsy Dr. Hall cauterized the afflicted area and removed the tumor but that means the cause of the hematuria was determined and resolved in one fell swoop.

I am also happy to say I had no other symptoms, either pain or interference with urinary function. I offer this much detail only to preach caution when one has any variance from normality in their bodies and to get to a doctor posthaste. If I had ignored the obvious blood and then, seeing my urine clear the next day I may not have seen my family doctor and the tumor may have grown. I have received ample sympathy and concern from family and friends and I’m sure my readers here would offer more but it is unnecessary. With proper followup I should be fine.

But during the interim between discovery and resolution, I got a letter from a collection agency dunning me for an unpaid hospital bill in the amount of $24.85. I called the agency and talked to a very nice lady who said all she could tell me was that this bill dated from 2010. I was hospitalized for four days at that time for severe back spasms, I received steroids and narcotics as treatment and have had no major trouble since.

But the bill troubled me. The year prior I had cardiac bypass surgery and spent a total of 18 days in the hospital and the only out of pocket expense I had was $47 as the uninsured part of a charge for the ambulance that transported me from the regular hospital to the local Health South rehab facility, a distance of about a mile.

I told the collector that I doubt I owed the bill but if she could send an itemized statement proving I did owe I would pay it. But if I fought it suing me would not be worth it, and she agreed on both counts.

I got the bill this weekend and the charges are laid out for each injection, each IV bag, each doctor consult, and each pill of my regular prescriptions I was given. It totaled around $7500 and all adjustments/payments were shown. There was one adjustment for the exact $24.85 I have now been told I owe, but adding all the charges and subtracting all the adjustments/payments leaves that balance. I will speak with the billing office tomorrow to find out why that piddling amount seemingly was not covered.

Coincidentally, last week I got another bill from the hospital which I at first thought was the one fulfilling my request. Instead it was for around $78 for the uninsured portion of treatment in July. I was puzzled as to what that could be for. As some of you know I had a toe amputated more than a year ago and the resultant wound on the outside bottom of my foot has stubbornly refused to fully close. Almost every Friday for about a year I have gone to the Wound Healing Center operated by Monongalia General Hospital but in a separate building off the main hospital campus.

When I checked with the business office I learned this $78 bill was for one of those visits, though my insurance had fully covered all of the other treatments. That office is now looking into this so I probably won;t have to pay it. But each treatment costs $1200.

I am very fortunate with my insurance coverage. I am enrolled in Medicare and since my only income is from Social Security I am eligible for Medicaid which generally covers the costs that Medicare does not.

All this is a lead in to the story I read Sunday about a man who underwent back surgery. Peter Drier had the surgery at Lenox Hill Hospital in Manhattan last December. When his bills arrived they were for $56,000 from the hospital, $4500 from the anesthesiologist, and $133,000 from his own orthopedic doctor who performed the operation. Drier was not alarmed as he had insurance through his employer, a bank, and knew that company would negotiate a lower fee and pay the bill.

But he also received a bill for $117,000 for an “assistant surgeon”, a neurosurgeon from Queens with whom he was not familiar and did not recall ever meeting. (The complete story can be found here: )

This “drive by doctoring” has become common across the country. It is one way doctors and hospitals can maintain income when the reimbursement rates for Medicare have been lowered and private insurers have also reduced rates. What does this mean for the doctors? Well, pity them, From the article:

The average base salary for neurosurgeons decreased to $590,000 in 2014 from $630,000 in 2010, according to Merritt Hawkins, a physician staffing firm.

Probably on food stamps.

As the article further notes, along with providing tales of some other patients, very often these “assisting” doctors are out of network so do not accept the rate negotiated by insurers with in network providers.

In Pittsburgh, as many of you know, there is an ongoing battle between two health care/health insurance giants over market share. UPMC, an independent arm of the University of Pittsburgh, and Highmark Blue Cross with a similar tie in to Allegheny Health Network (AHN) are on the verge of refusing to have the providers in their system treat patients insured by the other system. This is so even though many patients have maintained the same doctors for years only to now see those practices being purchased by the system through which they do not have insurance.

That explanation does not begin to cover all the details or nuances of this dispute but just from that overview it should be clear that the patients are the losers.

Another phenomenon which has drawn attention of late in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is the practice of hospitals who now have doctors under their control but whose offices are in a separate building to bill patients for a hospital visit who have been no closer than their physician’s examining room, sometimes miles away. Medicare permits this and has done so for a number of years so a Medicare patient may now receive a bill for hospital care which may not be reimbursed by Medicare.

I believe my own billing woes and the tales from the New York patients together with the UPMC-Highmark conundrum provide ever more of a basis for this nation to establish a single payer health care system.That way patients would know without a doubt whether they will have any out of pocket expenses…co-pays and deductibles can be even across the board..and all these little tricks designed to increase income but which have nothing to do with patient care, successful or not, can be eliminated.

My own woes are minimal compared to the troubles reported elsewhere. If my billing is correct, it amounts to around $100, a small price to pay for the excellent and attentive care I have been the fortunate recipient of. The other patients whose tales appear here have had far more difficulties than have I.

I have advocated for single payer from this space previously. See:

My suggestion is to simply expand Medicare to include all. I’ll leave the exact mechanisms for doing so and funding it to the folks who have access to and the ability to analyze the appropriate data and formulate it into a workable system.

The alternative is to keep the status quo and that means that some patients will not have access to the care they need simply because they have the wrong insurer and can in no way afford to pay for their care from their own funds.

There is a word for how our health care insurance system now works for millions of Americans. That word is “WRONG”.



As to my debt to Mon General Hospital. I must correct myself, the amount sought is $23.85 not $24.85. The old memory just isn’t as it used to be.

But that is insignificant. I talked to a woman in the business office today and learned this. When I was in that hospital from June 24-27, 2010, I was not really there. I was an outpatient, there for observation only. The funny thing was, though I first went to the Emergency Room, by ambulance no less, I was evaluated there and told I was being admitted. I then was transported to a private room. That night and for three more days I wore a hospital gown, availed myself of a hospital toilet, was injected with a hospital provided saline solution and the alternately steroids to reduce the inflammation in my back and relax the muscles and dosed with narcotics for the pain. I ate the meals from the hospital kitchen, had nurses tend to me wearing the standard color scrubs the hospital designates for them, and had the combination call button/TV remote at my side. That was all just like my other 7-8 overnight stays in the same facility.

I can’t swear to this, but the doctor or nurse telling me I was going upstairs to a room said that I was being admitted, not held for observation.

This practice has become common as this report from the kaiser Family Foundation reveals.

The practice also often leads to higher out of pocket costs to patients since many insurers, including Medicare, may not pay for all outpatient treatment.

How did this work in my case? During my stay, besides the medications prescribed for that event, I was provided my regular medications that I take every day at home. Since I am a heart attack survivor that includes aspirin. I buy a bottle of 300 count 81 mg aspirin at Dollar General for no more than $4.00. In the hospital I received 325 mg aspirins daily at $1.35 a pop. My other meds incurred a charge per pill of that amount up to $3.00 apiece.

Today I was informed Medicare does not cover the cost of your regular meds when not an inpatient in the hospital. My total bill for these meds was $118.15. To put this somewhat in perspective, my Medicare Part D prescription coverage is excellent. I can get a 90 day supply for a co-pay of $2.55 for generics (which all but one of mine is) to around $6 for name brand. That amount has varied over the nearly 8 years I have been enrolled, but not by much. So in those years my co-pays have amounted to approximately $700 (not all meds have been prescribed for that period).

But, strangely, even though Medicare presumably would not cover the cost of my in hospital meds for outpatient care, something happened to all but $23.85 of the $118.15 charge. The billing rep could not access the information to tell me exactly why that occurred but did point to the section of my itemized statement covering these meds where the coding indicates they will not be covered.

My other hospitalization experience leads me to believe that if the hospital had been honest with my patient classification, though Medicare rules, arcane as they are, permit this…what I would call billing abuse…I would have had no balance due.

My inclination, then is to simply not pay this. The woman from the collection agency inferred that they would not pursue the matter into court. Unless someone gives me a very compelling argument in favor of paying (and I am open to that from a moral perspective) my checkbook will remain closed.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • Little_Minx  On September 22, 2014 at 4:23 PM

    Good to see you online again, UMOC, despite travails great and small.

  • Reg Henry  On September 23, 2014 at 9:37 AM

    You have been to the wilderness and back — and you write well about it. Glad you are on the road to recovery. That will be $23.85 please!

  • toadsly  On September 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM

    Terrific read. Glad you’re now doing well. I’m in your corner regarding paying this small bill.

  • Little_Minx  On September 23, 2014 at 5:42 PM

    UMOC, have you considered submitting this post to a local newspaper? (They’d probably want a shorter version, due solely to space considerations). I’d bet you’re far from the only healthcare consumer in your area to be the target of such an attempted goring.

    • toadsly  On September 24, 2014 at 9:05 AM

      I agree. This post is worthy of major-newspaper publication.

  • umoc193  On September 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM

    Thanks for the kind words all. As tp paying the bill, I discussed this with my shrink earlier this afternoon. Paraphrasing her response she said that I was probably justified in looking at nonpayment as a form of protest first about the rules that permit hospitals to tell hospitalized patients they have not been admitted despite all evidence to the contrary and second about the excessive charge for pills. Further if I refuse to pay there is little harm to be done to the hospital’s finances. Ultimately I have to vote my conscience. Know where I can get one cheap?

    I saw my family doctor after that and gave him a quick rundown while he was examining me and he was amused. I din’t ask his advice.

    Let me add two things. This practice (and the pill costs) I have read about in other cases. Second the facility, Monongalia General Hospital, has provided me excellent service for nearly 35 years through 4 major surgeries and 7-8 other admissions, plus various test and ER visits. It happens to have been established by Monongalia County which continues to provide general oversight though there is a separate governing board, on which a close friend of mine serves.

    I have adopted an attitude of amused insouciance on this issue. Anger is not welling up to disturb my psyche. No profane diatribe will emanate from my mouth.

    I just know that while the effects of these odd nuances of health care on me are remarkably minor but to others they have been or could be devastating.

    We’ll never have a perfect system but my belief is single payer or some form of thereof would eliminate or prevent abuses such as these.

  • Little_Minx  On September 27, 2014 at 10:36 PM

    TOURIST: We saw video on tonight’s network news of the eruption of Mt. Ontake. They claimed that it began erupting without warning, but I wondered: weren’t there even any earthquakes to give a hint of the impending eruption (which is commonly the case with volcanoes)?

    • Tourist  On September 29, 2014 at 8:23 AM

      Hi, Minx! These are volcanic islands. The earth moves. They monitor everything all the time as best they can. There are four hundred measurable earthquakes a day – including five so far today, two yesterday and eight the day before that people would have felt (i.e., at least “1” on the 0-7 seismic intensity scale). Mt. Fuji is an active volcano. Mt. Ontake had been of greater interest than most because it erupted in 1979. It gave plenty of warning then. They say that was not the case this time – not the pattern. I have no basis for disputing that and I hear no one disputing it yet. Because it’s been the biggest news story since Saturday and the Sunday and daytime talk shows have dealt with little else, a talking head here or there has asked: “Was there really no way to know?” Something may come out, or simply just be learned. Until then, put up or shut up! (Not you, Minx!)

      Right now the warning is of large flying rocks out to a radius of 4 kilometers. That’s a 5-mile diameter circle, 20 square miles. Even in boondocks, what must be inside that circle? Maybe no villages – I don’t know – but homes, restaurants, hot springs. All those people were on the mountain because people like to go to that mountain. When – based on what indications – do you decide to shut it all down? If you think the thing is going to blow up, obviously. Otherwise? When it’s been rumbling pretty much like this for decades?

      As I understand it, the frequency of certain seismic indicators had increased recently, focusing the attention of the experts, but then it decreased again. Then the mountain went boom.

      Let’s hope, as I said, that there is something to learn. That’s all right now.


      UMOC, it sounds brutal. It’s great to hear that it’s working out. All the best!

      • Little_Minx  On September 29, 2014 at 3:13 PM

        Many thanks for the explanation, Tourist. I wonder how common it is for volcanoes to erupt like that with relatively little warning. For those of us who recall Mt. St. Helen, there was LOTS of advance warning, although obviously the experts could hardly forecast a specific date, so some people got caught and died there. I hope Mt. Ontake’s survivors can all be rescued (and recover from their injuries, where applicable).

        • Tourist  On September 29, 2014 at 8:20 PM

          It’s Tuesday. At this point, TV is bringing in experts who were not involved, to second-guess those who were, and they are pretty much saying the eruption would have surprised them, too.

          It seems Mt. Ontake is one of 47 volcanoes monitored continuously (24/7). The monitoring, however, is by instruments and is centralized at the Meteorological Agency. There is a question now as to whether an on-site presence might have made a difference. Fair question, I would think – solid question. Completely speculative is the question whether the judgment that nothing was happening was affected by this being the peak tourist season. Remember “Jaws”? That would be potentially, though not necessarily, scandalous if so. There is no reason (yet) for believing it is.

          About a year ago, the mayor of a small town learned in the middle of the night from the Meteorological Agency that the slow-moving typhoon was dumping more water than expected, increasing the risk of mudslides in his town – not a warning that there would be mudslides; merely that the chances had become greater. He decided it would be even more dangerous to send the residents out into 100 m.p.h. winds in the dark with nowhere to go, so he did not order an evacuation. More than forty people died. With hindsight, it had been the wrong decision. Learn from it.

          Absent bad faith, I cut decision-makers a lot of slack.

          • Little_Minx  On September 29, 2014 at 11:08 PM

            Thanks, Tourist. I guess the lesson is that Nature can control people far more than people can control Nature.

Please give me your thoughts.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: